Welcome to the survey for the Conjuring-2023 Please, if possible, write something in each field in this survey. Click the blue button "Next" to advance to the next question. (The whole survey will take about 20-25 minutes)
In the stated learning objectives, certain promises were made. It was stated that on completion of the workshop, the student should have improved specific skills and abilities, as well as having gained new knowledge.
Was the actual content of the course relevant to these learning objectives?1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
My thoughts, opinions & comments:
Click the blue button "Next" to advance to the next question.
I have found unexpected bonus value beyond the stated learning objectives.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
The planning of the course (lessons, extra lectures, workshops, your own time) was relevant to the stated contents of the course.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
The course's design, content and implementation stimulated me and/or challenged my previous knowledge in a constructive manner, and have had a positive effect on my artistic research & explorations.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
I felt safe enough to try out everything I wanted, with no fear of being "judged". Both teachers and fellow students treated me as an equal peer.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
The workload and study pace during the course was reasonable.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
I am satisfied with my own contributions in the work during the course.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
(Please give examples in the comment field below of how you contributed in the group):
The venue and the space was well suited for the course.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
Elaborate in the field below - was the room ok? The food? The staff?
I am satisfied with the course as a whole.1: I do not agree at all / 5: I partly agree / 10: I agree completely
There were a few extra events in the evenings.• Intro to 3D-printing, with Micke Askernäs• A Session with Horret Wu• "Towards a mutual body of knowledge" session with the female participants.• Open Stage performances
These extra events were good or bad? Too much or too little? Thoughts?
What is my opinion about the instructor/instructors (Tom, Leif, Tim & Håkan)?(Not seeking general flattery, but knowledge about what worked and what can be improved. How did you percieve their competence and knowledge as teachers of magic? Were they able to listen? General behaviour? Gender perspectives? Foundation of values? Anything, good or bad.)
When comparing my expectations beforehand with what the course actually consisted of... what was different and what was as I expected?
What is the most important things I brought with me home from this course?
What in the course is important to keep, and what is important to change?
What are my wishes and desires for the future, in the context of this education? What would a good next step be?
Other comments and opinions (anything we might have missed to ask or comment on in this survey)What would you say to someone who is hesitant to sign up for this workshop?
Thank you for your valuable input! (Don't forget to click "Submit" )
Time's up
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Sign me up for the newsletter!
Δ
0 Comments
Leave a comment